Sandia team studies selective MOFs for rare-earth element separation in aqueous mixtures

Purifying rare earth critical metals from ores with complex mixtures typically involves strong acids and hazardous solvents, and is primarily conducted in China. However, over the past three years, a team of researchers from Sandia National Laboratories has been developing an environmentally friendly method to separate these rare-earth elements from watery mixtures.

Initially, the team made and modified metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) to test their ability to adsorb these vital metals. They then used computer simulations and X-ray-based experiments to investigate how the rare-earth elements interact with the synthesized sponges. The team’s ultimate goal is to design MOFs that selectively absorb one rare earth metal while excluding others.

Their findings were recently published in a series of scientific papers, including one in ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces.

“We synthesized MOFs with variable surface chemistry and were able to show through adsorption experiments that these MOFs can pick out rare-earth elements from a mixture of other metals. They are more selective for the rare earths—that’s good. Importantly, we illustrated that their ability to pick out metals can be fine-tuned by adding chemical groups on their surfaces”, says Anastasia Ilgen, a Sandia geochemist and project leader.

The researchers selected two zirconium-based MOFs for the project. These MOFs are highly stable in water and easily adjustable, according to Dorina Sava Gallis, a Sandia materials chemist involved in the project.

MOFs consist of metal “hubs” and carbon-based linker “rods,” which can be interchanged to create nanosized sponges with different properties. Also, chemists can add different chemical groups within MOFs to modify their properties or engineer structures with missing rods, Sava Gallis said.

In a study published in Chemical Communications, Sava Gallis and her team experimented with two types of MOFs featuring zirconium hubs. They attached new chemical groups to the linkers in one MOF building block, while attaching them to the metal hub in another.

The team found that the MOFs with missing linkers bound more of the two rare-earth elements compared to those without missing linkers, as expected. The addition of an amino group to the linker had minimal impact on the adsorption of any of the metals. However, incorporating a negatively charged chemical group called phosphonate into the linker improved the adsorption of all the metals. Interestingly, in the MOF structure where the chemical groups were attached to the metal hubs, the additional chemical groups did not make much of a difference on the adsorption of the rare-earth elements. However, they greatly increased the selectivity for nickel over cobalt, Sava Gallis said.

“We are seeing that both approaches we implemented effectively tune the selectivity for different ions. We’re looking into designing new materials, combining the knowledge we have gained from studying these two material systems, to intentionally tailor the adsorption selectivity for each metal of interest”, says Sava Gallis.

To guide the design of MOFs selective for specific rare-earth metals further, Sandia computational materials scientist Kevin Leung used two different computer modeling techniques. First, he conducted molecular dynamics simulations to understand the environment of rare-earth elements in water, with or without other chemicals, or within a MOF structure. Then he performed detailed density functional theory modeling to calculate the energy for 14 rare-earth elements from cerium to lutetium going from water to a binding site with various surface chemistries. These findings were published in Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics.

Consistent with the earlier experimental work, Leung found that rare-earth elements do not exhibit a preference for binding with amines over water. However, they do show a preference for negatively charged chemicals like sulfate or phosphate compared to water. Leung found this preference is stronger for heavier rare-earth elements such as lutetium compared to lighter elements like cerium and neodymium.

The goal was to find a chemical that would allow them to select one metal, but unfortunately everything modeled had a uniform trend, Leung said. He hypothesized that combining a slightly positively charged surface chemical with a negatively charged surface chemical would be able to select for one metal. However, this approach has not yet been attempted.

To see precisely how the rare-earth metals interact with MOFs, Ilgen used X-ray spectroscopy to examine the chemical environment of three rare-earth elements in zirconium-based MOFs and chromium-based MOFs. Using synchrotron-based X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy at Argonne National Laboratory, Ilgen observed that the rare-earth element chemically bonded to the metal hub in both zirconium and chromium MOFs. In the MOF with a phosphonate surface group, the rare-earth metals bound to the phosphonate instead of the metal hub.

Previous articleArgentina Lithium reports geophysical survey adds nearly 600 hectares of potential brine aquifer at rincon west project and plans additional drilling
Next articleUni-Graz: Start-up revolutionises recycling of e-car batteries